alright, since I've finished the previous 4 theories people requested (to the best of my ability)

Ill set this as the term for each Q&T(Question and theory) as 4 per time.

I would love to hear any questions about the general fnaf lore that you believe should be tackled and want answered.

(Warning: dont have any of the tales. Budgets low. And some of the FF's I haven't finished. But anything directly about the games-(minus itp) I can attempt to answer)

One person per question. And must be serious questions.

1. Who killed Phone guy.

Hey guys! With TWB out for a while I wanted to raise attention to an...unusual moment in The Week Before. I've talked about this before but in general I wanted to raise awareness of it and discuss it.

On Night 3, Ralph says his catchprase, "It's time to make the donuts."

And gets an answer. A child laughs behind him, and when Ralph turns around, all he sees where the laugh came from where lockers and shadow. This ghost was not aggressive to Ralph, and yet was close enough to hear him say his catchphrase.

Ralph says he directly this catchphrase came from old commercials.

Old commercials that first came out in 1983.

And here's the proof:

https://trademarks.justia.com/737/14/time-to-make-the-73714702.html

Please note this oddity happens in the opening pages of Night 3, in other words, a passage you will always come across regardless of what choices you make throughout the week.

Although this isn't a theory I myself belief; it is one I was requested to do, and so I shall do so to my utmost ability.

To start the theory off, we should establish the base; Andrew is a member of the mci, and their were actually 6 missing children.

When he died, he possessed golden freddy or some other suit, possibly with a green crocodile mask.

Into the pit has 6 children being killed by pittrap(a rather harmful fellow), which at that point in the books and games alike, charlie would not have been killed or even at the restaurant. Which indicates that this 6th person is their own entity. Into the pit is clearly meant to establish when the mci did take place, so it wouldn't be too far a stretch to assume that a kid killed in that mci also exists in the games.

Andrew has a crocodile mask, as noted by literally every andrewmci believer, but what's also noticeable on how we know another green lizard in the series who it could also represent: Monty.

Yes, alligators and crocodiles are not the same thing, but at the same time; we were told it was a crocodile from someone VIEWING the mask, and not the one wearing the mask.

So the viewer could have mistaken the two, its a extremely common thing where people can't tell the difference between a alligator and a crocodile.

And it goes even further, monty could have seriously been a crocodile but just changed overtime because people considered him a alligator. If the shoe fits; wear it. And Fazbear entertainment loves money.

Monty is extremely violent and destroys everything around him, like Andrew does,

Hes persistent down to the last arm in sb after being scrapped. Like how Andrews persistent in torturing afton.

So is it too much of a stretch to assume he's connected to monty and in the games..., as well as the happiest day which he shares a mask with?

Perhaps. Lets move on.

Something to note is that toy chica in the anime toy chica high school cut scenes in ucn does kill 7 People.

Excluding puppet. Its 6. Just like Andrew mci.

The list being in total, Foxy, Freddy, Wolf, Toy Bonnie, the Mangle, the Puppet, and Pigpatch.

Now, if we just remove the puppet, it just leaves freddy, foxy, wolf, toy bonnie, mangle, and pigpatch. On which each could connected to a certain animatronic, (Freddy-gabriel, toy bonnie-jeremy, etc)

But of this list, one seems off, no?

On this list, every single person has made some kind of appeareance in game, some evidence of their existence.

Except wolf. Which has only been in the twisted ones.

And just because Roxanne is also a wolf doesn't mean their THE wolf, its a very clear different design.

One animatronic who had never shown up in the games matching with the one child who had never been mentioned in the games; almost a match made in heaven regarding evidence there.

In the man in room 1280, he clearly is recreating the conditions that are ucn; a eternal hell in aftons mind because of the rage felt against william. Which matches Toysnhk to a tee regarding rageful behavior. and would make sense on why old man consequences is telling Toysnhk to rest; we see how rageful Andrew is and how much that comment would be warranted. Andrew wished to torture afton forever for what he did to andrew, just like Toysnhk.

Toysnhk is also confirmed to be a male which, unlike the unconfirmed cassidy, andrew is confirmed to be a male and fit the "He" they refer to.

And then, theirs the fact that you have to pick up 6 balloons in Pick Up The Balloons in ITP , while your character has a red shirt and black hair. It being next to golden freddy and killed by fetch in the minigame, both of which hes connected to, heavily indicates this is referencing Andrew.

Which adds another layer to it when you consider the fact that their were 6 balloons he picked up, but only 5 when fetch kills you in the mini game; because the 6th balloon was for you.

@ScraptrapOrCaine hopefully this satisfies you. I tried looking for evidence but it was hard to find concrete leads; so I just went with confirmed leads among the evidence.

We all know that William possesses Springtrap, which is a bunny. He also comes back again and again and again. In the Bible, rabbits represent death and resurrection. That’s why there is an Easter Bunny. Since Scott is Christian, do you think he took this into account, or is this just a coincidence. Give me your thoughts in the comments.

See in this theory ~

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=itJ_DJVKAW0

I really love BBVictim and want to spread awareness of it. I

know some people think it's odd, so if anyone has any questions or concerns about it logic-wise share it so I can address it :)

A while ago, I asked people to give me theory ideas.

I got four, I finished 3 so far.

Heres the results. I hope you enjoy.

(Ill have names attached so they know I answering their questions.)

I shall deliver and try to cook as promised

Chibi Funtime·3d

Why is the FNaF 1 kitchen's camera not working?,

Answer: theirs no clear answer , chibi, even after I looked around and did some research, but I did come up with 4 potential explanations that I hope satisfy you.. But first I'll list out all we know about the room.

A. The camera to the room does not show the footage. B, the animatronics can enter the room to do who knows what. C, the cameras not completely destroyed otherwise we wouldn't hear the footage. D, only chica and Freddy can enter the room. E, we can hear pots and pans in the kitchen , just can't see it.

5 pieces of evidence.... Not much to make a explanation with but I can work with that.

My four explanations on why the rooms camera doesn't show footage are as listed.

1. Scott got lazy and didn't finish the rooms camera, maybe he thought it would make it mysterious and had no real importance to it, but that feels like a copout so ill move to the next one.

2. Fazbear entertainment purposefully blocked the view to the camera. Theirs actually nothing wrong with the camera in question, but instead, they don't want the security guard to see the bodies of previous security guards, possibly phone guy, or just see how terrible their kitchen is. It would save them a possible lawsuit to just not allow the security guard to see the bodies they couldn't dispose of yet, instead of doing the legally right thing. We don't see blood on the table where the game over screen takes place, just eyes popping out and slight blood if I recall. Perhaps the animatronics stuff the guards and people in the suits in the kitchen; to "Prepare" the guards for the show, as a backroom of sorts. But this is just my hypothesis. We also know Fazbear entertainment is shady as hell and we also don't get footage of the hidden safe room where William committed the murders; so it could fit into a sort of irony that we can't see the room William committed the murders, and we can't see the room that his victims commit murder in. But I got another answer for you in case that doesn't satisfy you.

3. The animatronics destroyed the camera linking to the kitchen, just not to the point it destroyed the audio cable. They could have just smashed the glass part facing them for example. They could have multiple reasons or motives to do this actually.

A, could have been out of anger when they were newly possessed. B, could have been so the security guard can't track their activities there,

C, could even possibly have smashed the camera in a attempt to scare the old security guard and make them easier to terrify and kill. And with how we see golden freddy miss with our screen and the camera next to the office, they could have possibly messed with the kitchen camera which would make sense if they destroy it; their the most wrathful.

Another thing pointing to this particular explanation is the fact that its just the video part of the camera, if it was some other entity they would just take the entire camera down or destroy the part admitting audio as well. but the fact that the audios still in tact indicates that they either

A. Thought they completely destroyed the camera but didn't

B. Left the audio in tact so the security guard could hear what's happening in the room, but be unable to check the condition of it.

Which overall would make sense relating to the animatronics.

Finally, another possible reason (although less likely) is its actually not visible might be because its a pitch dark room, and the camera thinks its covering or not working as a result.

Lets be honest, Fazbear entertainment is not going to pay for the top of the line cameras. And it certainly won't pay for lights in that one room when none of the other rooms have lights. So it could be possible that the rooms just so dark that the camera can't capture anything, which is why it can capture sound.

If we got to physically see the camera, we would get the answer.

Of these explanations, I think 2 or 3 is most likely, hopefully these satisfy you.

(Sorry, got cut off from typing and it messed your name up)

Lumenniic·3d

ToysDCI.

Answer: in my humble opinion, I think it went something like this.

William was starting to lose his credibility in Henry's eyes. Charlotte recently died, bv and Elizabeth are both also deceased. When he started to get the rabbit suit for another spree of murder, he realized how the outcome would just repeat; they would just be revived by puppet. Basing off of how he acted in fnaf 3, he doesn't want the children in the suits alive after a certain point. Maybe because the experiment is over or because their too dangerous to him. But regardless, puppet tries to bring Freddy and revive the 5 new victims, but purple guy stops them, saying you cant.

When we see purple guy, he says the line "YOU CANT" which has confused the fandom since. Some belief he meant that they can't stop him. Some don't understand the meaning entirely. Some even think that it meant about them escaping.

But I personally think he was saying , "You cant save them" . as the previously line the puppet was saying was , "Save Him" iirc.

As a result, the toys weren't able to get possessed, and remained relatively normal despite the bodies.

Now someone is bound to ask, "But they do they act possessed like the classics? ", im getting there.

When the toys were made, Fazbear entertainment and Henry thought it would be wise to just take the metal from the classics and use it for the toys, which had a devastating consequence that none of them expected. Which leads to two different explanations on how the toys act but the explanations come from the same route and aren't that different.

A. Some of the remnant of the classics transferred over, and the classics partially all got put into new suits, with the exception to balloon boy as golden freddy likely wasn't able to be transferred and balloon boy acts normal. It also explains the attack patterns of the toys; their heavily match the classics in a way that's too suspicious.

Scott does love his repetition, but theirs also a method behind his madness.

The nightmares match the classics movements heavily as well. Likely because they are based off of the 1983-1987 animatronic counterparts.

Which makes sense why they would match.

But If we are following that logic, why would the toys also follow attack patterns? Unless its the same soul doing the attacking. But their is another explanation.

B. The agony in the metal itself transferred. While the toys do act like the classics movement wise, they don't match all the details. Only containing the amount rage the classics also have. They also are different in the withereds in that regard. All the toys (forgot whether or not mangle can be fooled) Can easily be fooled by wearing the mask, but the withereds are much harder to fool, william went into the fnaf 2 establishment and tampered with the animatronics, and while its never directly said, I think he tampered with the vision of the animatronics so they can no longer identify bad people and criminals so he could easily sneak in. The reason that the toys are so easily fooled is because they literally do not have minds, their just the rage transfered from the prewithereds/classics. But the withereds are much harder to fool because their is a mind, the majority can still be fooled but likely due to the fact that the soul beliefs its just another animatronic like how they fell for Williams lie. (Foxys soul just simply remembers that the mask is fake because of william),

another key piece of evidence to this conclusion would be fnaf 3. During fnaf 3, the toys have already been scrapped, clearly after fnaf 2. but if their was actually souls, this would not be happening. When the fnaf 1 animatronics were destroyed, their souls still remained and haunted because they were put to rest, so why would the toys be so easily put to rest when compared to the classics?

Because we know the phantoms are NOT the animatronics souls. Puppet is literally still alive and intact.

Which would mean the toys truly and utterlly are put to rest.

Hope this helps explanation wise.

SpookyDookie31·3d

Sping lock incient in fanf 3 and the misused suit in night 4 suster locatijn

With the first...im not sure entirely yet. Theirs not much evidence.. So ill talk about it at the end of my answer, if that's alright.

Answer: I believe the suit we see is a minireena suit. Imo.

Before the public outcry Crys out, let me cook.

Compare these two images.

While I'm not saying this is more obvious than it seems, the suit and the minireenas both carry heavily similaritys in design choice.

Its not puppet because the puppet Henry made wasn't springlock, and William would not make a security device.

Obviously not chica, as we see fun time chica later.

and so I think its more obviously spring minireena. The reason its right next to where ballora would be and why the minireenas flood in is because to them, your literally in the suit of their family.

Ive heard people often say the fun times are representative in ways to the afton family. And you could make a case for each, but you never hear who would represent afton,

well. Wouldn't it make sense that the only spring lock funtime and the one that is related as well to the minireenas be representative of afton?

The creepy grin as if always joyful and dancing being a expression of how he feels when hes in the suit, like the glitch trap in fnaf VR for example. (not saying that's afton, but the mimic is mimicking how afton would act there. )

The suit is also more isolated than the others in sl. Which again, makes sense when thinking of afton and his relationship with his family.

About the fnaf 3 springlock suits, the game mentions it once and isn't clear.

It could refer to multiple suits going off at once, or maybe one suit going off. (As spring locks could just refer to more than one springlock mechanism in the suit.)

But either way I dont think its referring to the bite victim. Yes, they died because "Technically" the springlocks went off and collapsed the jaw, but that would more likely be referred to as a bite of 83, or a other name. I don't think it would make sense to refer to it as the "Multiple spring lock failure" as it was just the ones in the jaw and the main reason it happened was because he cried after being forced into the animatronics metal jaw. Yes, the suit killed him, but the fault lies more on the people forcing him on the jaw of the animatronic itself.

And so, I came up with two explanations and answers for your question.

A. Its referring to a single suit activating its spring locks and going wild.

B. Its referring to two suits.

Because of this, ill give depth on both.

A,2. With the first explanation, it would be possible under one "What if", we would have to assume that the incident that William went through on the books where he was spring locked and survived also exists in the games as a canon event. If it were, it would make sense why its mentioned; the game that features him as a antagonist telling of a mistake he made that almost cost him his life early in his career. Theirs not as much evidence, as again, they don't go in-depth on the incident.

B,2. The assumption of it being two suits would naturally draw the possibility of it being the creation of shadow freddy and shadow bonnie. But unlike most explanations, I dont think that its actually their souls still in the suits.

Obviously, the only ones with access to the suits are employees, so if it is two suits that spring locked, its more likely employees than anything else.

But the suits are fundamentally different than the others. They are like golden freddy in the way that their mysterious, lore important, unexplained, and can teleport. But different coloration and attitude.

And then ,theirs the fundamental difference in how shadow bonnie acts early timeline vs late timeline.

Shadow Freddy appears two times in the entire game series, both relatively benevolent.

But shadow bonnie appears multiple times. Even in the books. In fnaf ar and the Fazbear fright story "Hide and seek" he is extremely violent after certain actions are taken, (fnaf ar, being When the player takes in too much of the miasma looking substance, while in hide and seek its because Toby cheated and or broke something, iirc).

But in fnaf 2, he just crashes the games, and in fnaf 3 he tries to set the souls free. Which makes me think as a person, he likely was a very justice/order focused person, when his body was removed from the suit, it only left the agony and mindset of him in the suit.

But with shadow freddy I think its likely his soul was more kind. We don't see him ever take a violent option and only guide people. Sure, he teleports next to the player in fnaf 3, but I don't recall ever hearing he actually kills the player. Which would possibly mean that during his lifespan, he possibly just loved his job and being in the suit, guiding children to the birthday room and performing.

I don't have much explanation for them. Or the spring lock incident, until its actually addressed.

Please give feedback below

I'm willing to look at particular incidents/topics in the games that people feel should be discussed, and trying to explain them. As long as its not directly about the books or about connections to said books(As I dont have them).

I want to do theorizing but don't have any starter ideas, and am curious to hear any.

I don’t really use Fandom anymore, and I don’t think I’ve ever posted anything on this fandom but I desperately want to share something I found that I don’t think anyone found yet(surprising given that people have been data-mining Ruin for like a year now).

I’ve always been rubbed the wrong way by Fredbear’s Nom Nom bites, the fact that they used the old FNAF 4 Fredbear sprite from the Bite of 83 always gave off the impression that something was off, I could tell that there was something more to it.

I decided to look further into it in Ruin, to put the mask on and see what happens to Fredbear’s Nom Nom Bites… And it was just as I expected.

Unlike the other Arcade’s had some glitchy effect, stayed largely the same or even had something stabbed into them(Princess Quest), Fredbear’s Nom Nom Bites is the one Arcade machine to completely disappear when you put the mask on, confirming my suspicions.

Fredbear’s Nom Nom Bites isn’t part of the Pizzaplex’s systems, neither the electrical nor security. It’s exact role is unknown to me so far, but it goes without saying that it’s another gigantic overlooked piece Scott and Steel Wool have left for us and with the high focus on glitchy arcades and in universe playable games amidst the growing plot, there is no way that it’s not important.

Personally I think that Fredbear’s Nom Nom Bites is going to be the last of the arcades we’ll need to deal with from the Pizzaplex.

Note to anyone on the Reddit: I did not plagiarize this post from there, I was the one who posted a less detailed version on Reddit.

What was the noise in the wall, in the new kid?

(Fazbear fright story relating to Golden freddy)

To my knowledge, we never got a answer, and it feels SOMEWHAT lore important as it has its own section in the story that's unrelated is out of place.

If anyone could, could you also provide the quote for it? I don't think the wiki has the exact quote and I don't have the book currently ..

Alright you can call me on this theory that was circulating the fandom of Glamrock Freddy being Mike. But I do think their could be a chance that it may be true. If you didn't knew from FNAF 6 their were 6 casualties of the fire. 4 being Springtrap, Baby, Puppet and Molten Freddy. Their is this theory that they are possessed by other animatronic in the Pizzaplex. Number 1, Glitchtrap and Springtrap theory as one their names end with trap and personalities not to far to being the same and in Wanted 1 those chips recovered from I think FNAF 6 they were downloaded which may have helped William Afton to leave from his personal hell and into the internet. The "I always come back" line could support this. Number 2, Glamrock Freddy and Mike being the same by one Freddy having a more human personality and does care for Gregory, I know it could be because of GGY and he must protect him. But he still would risk his career for others kids and burnt the Pizzaplex for others as well. He also genially cares for his friends stating he cares not just for Gregory and doesn't harm anyone unless someone is getting harmed. Number 3, Molten Freddy and Mangle being the same person. If the 'friends' term could be accurate maybe one of the bullies were Afton's victims or Mike tried to be a good person and helped kids. Remember much of Mike is still unknown. In order to redeem himself he would need to be kinder to more kids so it could imply him maybe befriending and acting nicer to kids. Afton may have taken advantage of this. To the point of yes I know that in FNAF 1 he was attacked but my guess they only attacked his adult version as he looked like William and as a teen or kid when he befriended them may have not resembled much of his dad's features. Mangle would be Molten Freddy as they attacked Burntrap for a reason and it's heavily shown that Burntrap and Springtrap are one in the same. It wanted revenge. Number 4 is the Puppet and this is interesting as their can be two ways. One it says that she may have possessed the Pizzaplex network as there are puppet plushies so she may have lived on somehow, my other take is that she could be Roxy as Charlie's green bracelet resembles her green nails and the puppet's colours resemble Roxy in way. Also that how the Puppet was shown as this protective avenger in the 2nd FNAF game and that Roxy was given a redemption in the 2nd game of Security Breach, it could be done on purpose. Number 5 is Baby and my take on this is what if Baby is actually Vanny. If you think about it Vanny was something that could have been implanted in Vanessa and wasn't her truly, Glitchtrap wanted to control Vanessa, so could he use some candidate to do so, Baby sided always with her dad. She may be Vanny downloaded into the network. Call me out on this and what could you think if it's true or not? My other take that it could be Chica possessed by Baby. But what do you think? Number 6 and finally Henry Emily, so you would who could this person posses? Well the closes you could think is Freddy but what if their is another Glamrock out there someone that was replaced by someone. Glamrock Bonnie he could be Henry Emily and may explain why metamorphically why Freddy misses him, maybe call me out on this and what you think?

The fnaf 1 and 2 gang in fnaf ar are made of metal in fnaf one they have mesh in ar they don't in fnaf 2 the toys are plastic in ar they are metal i think the company in the twisted ones made them and the share remnant

Fnaf 2 is a prequel we know that, but I don't think it's by that much I thinks it's by only a week. so, i think this because we know Ralf died but I think in the week before he was also recording for the second location. but oh, how are the withered animatronics that damaged considering fnaf 3 hasn't happened, yet you might say. well in the books and movie there are many different locations we don't see in the games I think that the withered animatronics are those ones possessed by the same remnant as they did with the toys. if you want to challenge my theory I willing to discuss in the comments.