All posts by Dr.Lantis

<div class="quote"><i>Autism Inc. wrote:
Also, William didn't kill the dog. As you progress through the "broken" minigame, loud car horns can be heard, and with the shape of the dead dog... <p>You can probably guess what happened. </p> </i></div>
<p>oh yeah, one can: afton drove over the dog on purpose. then he acted as if he wanted to "console" the poor chillun and then lured it away. afton planned it from the very beginning. </p>

<p>Well, I personally agree to the fullest to the Mangle = Dog's soul theory. For my reasons and more ideas of mine see here. </p>

<p>I think the biggest mistake we, the fnaf-fans, do, is, to try to reconstruct the storyline via the low minimum wages the night guards receive. I believe that this lil' oddity was made by scott as a huge distract.  </p><p>again: phone guy claims that the animatronics hadn't been cleaned since 20 years. if true, then the year 1993 doesn't fit at all. 1993 - 20 = 1973. there is NO indication that the tronics already existed that early. </p><p>if we play in 2003, it fits much better: in this case, the classic tronics were stored away shortly after lil' cry-cry from fnaf-4 perished. whilst fredbear, freddy, bonbon, chica and foxy were stored in the storage room of the fnaf-2 diner, the springbonnie costume was stolen and stored away at afton's home. </p><p>maybe the creepy lil' plushtrap from fnaf-4 is an allusion to the secretly hidden springbonnie costume? </p>

<div class="quote"><i>Starscream1998 wrote:
If he does care he sure as hell has a funny way of showing it.</i></div>
<p>yeah... like:
</p>

• fnaf -1 = 1993

• fnaf-2 = 1987

• fnaf-3 = 2017

• fnaf-4 = 1983

• fnaf-sl = 19??

<p>ok, we can sorta place the years, like: 1983 (fnaf-4), 1987 (fnaf-2), 19?? (fnaf-sl), 1993 (fnaf-1) and 2017 (fnaf-3). but... why publishing the game episodes in such anachronistic order? </p><p>plus the countless plot holes and logic fails ocurring within the game. my favorite example: phone guy says in fnaf-1 that the animatronics hadn't been washed in 20 years. if true, then the proposed date for fnaf-1 of 1993 doesn't fit at all, because we know that the year that the classic tronics were stored away was between fnaf-4 (1983) and fnaf-2 (1987). the problem: 1983/87 + 20 = 2003/2007. </p>

<div class="quote"><i>BenTRM wrote:
I heard something on YouTube about the guard in FNAF3 is actually one of the past guards! I think it was fritz smith because he only had one night that we know of (the custom night in fnaf2)</i></div>
<p>nope. definitively not:
</p><p>1. fnaf-3 happens ca. 30 years AFTER fnaf-2. where's yer proof that fritz was still alive in fnaf-3? </p><p>2. why would anyone hire an ex-employee from a suspicious company (which went bankrupt decades ago) who got fired after his very first nightshift because of incompetence and odor? </p><p>3. it's highly unlikely that it was fritz BECAUSE he worked only one night - and survived his shift (he received an firing slip). I highly doubt that one single, short night was enough to traumatize a person so deeply that he was halluzinating over every animatronic character. </p><p>4. the player halluzinates about freddy fazbear, boon boy, chica, mangle, puppet and foxy - and he's chased in real life by springtrap (aka springbonnie). how comes that bonnie, toy bonnie, toy freddy, toy chica and golden freddy (aka fredbear) are absent? as far as we know, fritz met all characters (except springbon/springtrap, of course) in fnaf-3. why does he not halluzinate about them, too??? </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Mr. Flumpty Bumpty wrote: </p> 2.  Actually Hand Unit in "Angsty Teen" mode claims that a corpse was found inside a vent, not Eggs.  And its mostly dismissed since Angsty Teen is the one mentioning it, may not be 100% true that it even happened.</i></div>
<p>whoopsie-daisy! :D my bad... :D however: I highly doubt that a computer could lie and make up such a story. and why should he? let's assume that Handy has always been possessed by ennard/mr. afton. then why on heaven should Handy come up with an invented creep story and thus risk the new employee running away? I thought ennard wants a new body? ;) </p> <div class="quote"><i>3.  The alternative ending is not canon and therefore is not intended to be used for anything.</i></div>
<p>I dunno. In my opinion it fits perfectly and it tells the true story behind purple guy and the killings of mr. afton's and all other chilluns. </p> <div class="quote"><i>4.  If Ennard is inside of the body, he'd want to emulate human behaviour to not look "strange" to other people.</i></div>
<p>if ennard was intelligent enough to lie to humans and even imitate their voices and behaviours - then why wasn't it clear to him that a human body would rot away and start looking creepy to other peoples? shouldn't one expect such an high-level artificial intelligence to first study humans (and their bodies) properly, before starting to misuse their bodies as costumes? </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>BlackfootFerret wrote: </p> Springtrap starts in the Upper Right of the FNAF 3 area after breaking out of the secret room, about where the secret room was in the FNAF 3 minigame.</i></div>
<p>huhh...??? where did you get that information from??? it may be indeed true that springtrap was stored and discovered in the secret room at "Freddy Fazbear's Pizza". but: there is no clue about where springtrap really starts at the fnaf-3 spook house attraction. and I doubt that there was a secret room like in the old pizzerias... </p> <div class="quote"><i>Yet, the FNAF 3 between-night minigame sprites look different. Bonnie's ears have three hinges, and he and Freddy have one button apiece, when they had zero buttons in FNAF 1, and 2 buttons in FNAF 2.</i></div>
<p>ummm... the main characters slightly change in appearance through ALL fnaf episodes. I'd rather say this happens due sloppery by Scott Cawthon and it has no bigger meaning. </p> <div class="quote"><i>Also, Purple Guy himself looks different. Stronger, faster, he's gone from trudging along to having Kool-Aid Man's power to smash through walls.</i></div>
<p>again, this might be another lacking by Scott und mustn't have a bigger meaning. </p><p>my personal main concern is -as so often- the problem of Scott's sloppy way to tell a story. all these oh-so-great new details approach in an anachronistic order, which makes it very difficult and troublesome to recronstruate a plausible fnaf-chronology. </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>BlackfootFerret wrote: Here's why Egg Benedict is William Afton: </p> </i></div>
<p>Srry, Buddy... but there are some things you might have missed: </p>

• no matter how hard I try, I don't see any "grey eyed reflections". nowhere.
• our main protagonist claims that a corpse was found inside a vent, not long before he started his job. well, this very corpse could have been mr. afton, right? thus, there's no 100% secureness that we play as no one but mr. afton. btw: it somehow puzzles me that everyone seems to blend out the corpse story... I wonder why...
• there is the alternative ending in which Ennard visits our home. and we are still munching popcorn. explain this.
• a robot just can't eat popcorn - and why should he do so anyway??? since when do robots need food???

<p>yes, the bluebird is a popular photo motive and one of the most drawn and photographed birds. especially at the niagara falls and in missouri park areas. the "eternal return" idea Comes from a natural habit of the bluebird: he always comes back in spring, summer and autumn for breeding. </p><p>well, if scott cawthon didn't just pick the bird picture and waterfall pic because of the bird's and waterfall's popularity, then it might contain two puns: a) to where the fictious location of the pizzerias can be found and b) a pun to the creeper "he's coming back. he always does." </p>

<p>the bird is most possibly an eastern bluebird (sialia). it's one of the protected crest birds of...? can one guess it? :D </p><p>it's a very popular bird and in Folks tales, it symbolises cheearing up and ETERNAL RETURN... I'm somehow scared about the latter meaning... </p>

<p>It could be possible that most of the stage decoration was mobile. if these animatronics were entertaining children, then they surely were telling different stories and thus needed different backgrounds. the decoration movement may be explained by oncussions caused by the animatronics when walking away. I mean, these puppet surely weigh a LOT... </p>

<div class="quote"><i>Vitreousbloom wrote: <p>I feel like this could be a plausible theory. Here's the blueprints if you want to see it: </p> <figure class="article-thumb tleft show-info-icon" style="width: 1175px"> <figcaption> <p class="caption">The map of the location as seen on the Breaker Panel.</p> </figcaption></figure></i></div>
<p>
See? the blueprint strengthens my theory (btw: I think the white squares represent humans, the grey quares represent animatronics): </p><p>1. mr. afton's house: can be seen at the upper right corner. it consists of two floors, the cellar floor (at the most upper right corner) houses the animatronics freddy, bonnie, chica and foxy. the white quare there is lil' cry-cry from fnaf-4. the upper floor (a lil' to the left and accentuated in white) is actually connected with circus baby's - thus, mr. afton's house is connected to circus baby's. </p><p>2. fredbear's family diner: can be found at the very upper left corner of the map. it is connected to the great party room where baby should be. in fredbear's we see the main stage hall with fredbear and springbonnie. the white square may be lil' crycry's big bro. </p><p>3. plushtrap's lair: can be found at the very lower left corner. it is connected to what I think should be ballora's showroom. in plushtrap's lair we see several grey squares - does that mean there are several pushtraps? the white square may be blondie (mr. afton's daughter). </p><p>I summarize: as I already stated, mr. afton's house, fredbear's family diner and plushtrap's lair are all connected with circus baby's. thus, mr. afton had access to many locals. </p>

<p>I have my doubts, either. </p><p>however: the similarities between the private room and the fnaf-1 office are too striking as that one could wave them aside just like that. in my opinion, the design similarities were made on purpose: they were meant to show us that the pizzerias were inhabited and used by the same person. </p><p>this goes perfectly d'accord with the fact, that baby's pizza world and freddy fazbear's pizza were connected via walk-on-able vents (see the blueprints in fnaf-sl). </p>

<div class="quote"><i>Mr. Flumpty Bumpty wrote:
I feel like BFF's theories are far more solid than this.</i></div>
<p>BFF...? please write in full letters...
</p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>AnimeStrife009 wrote: Although we know from playing as night guards throughout the games, it is very much possible to complete the week, resulting in being paid. Ennard would have to dish out the dough when really he could just step up and murder the guy so as not to lose money. </p> </i></div>
<p>If Afton/Ennards uses several locals at the same time, he can keep his chances for a catch high. Besides, not he does the dirty work, but his puppets-o'-doom. ;) And as long as no one sees him, he doesn't need to hurry for a new body. </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Phone Guy and HandUnit probably share the same kind of 'sarcastic' comments because that's Scott's humour. He likes including witty remarks. </p> </i></div>
<p>Ummmmmm... at least HandUnit was, if I'm not mistaken, NOT synchronized by Scott. ;))) In FnaF-SL, there are several synchronists. </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>AnimeStrife009 wrote: Although we know from playing as night guards throughout the games, it is very much possible to complete the week, resulting in being paid. Ennard would have to dish out the dough when really he could just step up and murder the guy so as not to lose money. </p> </i></div>
<p>That's why I think that Afton indeed works/worked at ALL of these locations.
1. As we see in FnaF-SL, at least fredbear's diner and baby's Pizza World are geographically and architectal connected to each other (plus Afton's home).
2. We never found out what happened to the abandoned buildings. All we know for sure is, that all fredbear's and freddy's share HUGE similarities to each other in architecture and design. Maybe he just re-designed one and the same building over the years?
3. We also know for sure that Afton created all animatronics and then hired them to the Pizzeria owners.
</p><p>Well, let's be serious and honest: my three arguments in mind, is it really that far-fetched to assume that Afton first worked at all of these locals and then had access to all pizzerias? Or even come into possession of them? </p>