A while ago, I asked people to give me theory ideas.
I got four, I finished 3 so far.
Heres the results. I hope you enjoy.
(Ill have names attached so they know I answering their questions.)
I shall deliver and try to cook as promised
Why is the FNaF 1 kitchen's camera not working?,
Answer: theirs no clear answer , chibi, even after I looked around and did some research, but I did come up with 4 potential explanations that I hope satisfy you.. But first I'll list out all we know about the room.
A. The camera to the room does not show the footage. B, the animatronics can enter the room to do who knows what. C, the cameras not completely destroyed otherwise we wouldn't hear the footage. D, only chica and Freddy can enter the room. E, we can hear pots and pans in the kitchen , just can't see it.
5 pieces of evidence.... Not much to make a explanation with but I can work with that.
My four explanations on why the rooms camera doesn't show footage are as listed.
1. Scott got lazy and didn't finish the rooms camera, maybe he thought it would make it mysterious and had no real importance to it, but that feels like a copout so ill move to the next one.
2. Fazbear entertainment purposefully blocked the view to the camera. Theirs actually nothing wrong with the camera in question, but instead, they don't want the security guard to see the bodies of previous security guards, possibly phone guy, or just see how terrible their kitchen is. It would save them a possible lawsuit to just not allow the security guard to see the bodies they couldn't dispose of yet, instead of doing the legally right thing. We don't see blood on the table where the game over screen takes place, just eyes popping out and slight blood if I recall. Perhaps the animatronics stuff the guards and people in the suits in the kitchen; to "Prepare" the guards for the show, as a backroom of sorts. But this is just my hypothesis. We also know Fazbear entertainment is shady as hell and we also don't get footage of the hidden safe room where William committed the murders; so it could fit into a sort of irony that we can't see the room William committed the murders, and we can't see the room that his victims commit murder in. But I got another answer for you in case that doesn't satisfy you.
3. The animatronics destroyed the camera linking to the kitchen, just not to the point it destroyed the audio cable. They could have just smashed the glass part facing them for example. They could have multiple reasons or motives to do this actually.
A, could have been out of anger when they were newly possessed. B, could have been so the security guard can't track their activities there,
C, could even possibly have smashed the camera in a attempt to scare the old security guard and make them easier to terrify and kill. And with how we see golden freddy miss with our screen and the camera next to the office, they could have possibly messed with the kitchen camera which would make sense if they destroy it; their the most wrathful.
Another thing pointing to this particular explanation is the fact that its just the video part of the camera, if it was some other entity they would just take the entire camera down or destroy the part admitting audio as well. but the fact that the audios still in tact indicates that they either
A. Thought they completely destroyed the camera but didn't
B. Left the audio in tact so the security guard could hear what's happening in the room, but be unable to check the condition of it.
Which overall would make sense relating to the animatronics.
Finally, another possible reason (although less likely) is its actually not visible might be because its a pitch dark room, and the camera thinks its covering or not working as a result.
Lets be honest, Fazbear entertainment is not going to pay for the top of the line cameras. And it certainly won't pay for lights in that one room when none of the other rooms have lights. So it could be possible that the rooms just so dark that the camera can't capture anything, which is why it can capture sound.
If we got to physically see the camera, we would get the answer.
Of these explanations, I think 2 or 3 is most likely, hopefully these satisfy you.
(Sorry, got cut off from typing and it messed your name up)
ToysDCI.
Answer: in my humble opinion, I think it went something like this.
William was starting to lose his credibility in Henry's eyes. Charlotte recently died, bv and Elizabeth are both also deceased. When he started to get the rabbit suit for another spree of murder, he realized how the outcome would just repeat; they would just be revived by puppet. Basing off of how he acted in fnaf 3, he doesn't want the children in the suits alive after a certain point. Maybe because the experiment is over or because their too dangerous to him. But regardless, puppet tries to bring Freddy and revive the 5 new victims, but purple guy stops them, saying you cant.
When we see purple guy, he says the line "YOU CANT" which has confused the fandom since. Some belief he meant that they can't stop him. Some don't understand the meaning entirely. Some even think that it meant about them escaping.
But I personally think he was saying , "You cant save them" . as the previously line the puppet was saying was , "Save Him" iirc.
As a result, the toys weren't able to get possessed, and remained relatively normal despite the bodies.
Now someone is bound to ask, "But they do they act possessed like the classics? ", im getting there.
When the toys were made, Fazbear entertainment and Henry thought it would be wise to just take the metal from the classics and use it for the toys, which had a devastating consequence that none of them expected. Which leads to two different explanations on how the toys act but the explanations come from the same route and aren't that different.
A. Some of the remnant of the classics transferred over, and the classics partially all got put into new suits, with the exception to balloon boy as golden freddy likely wasn't able to be transferred and balloon boy acts normal. It also explains the attack patterns of the toys; their heavily match the classics in a way that's too suspicious.
Scott does love his repetition, but theirs also a method behind his madness.
The nightmares match the classics movements heavily as well. Likely because they are based off of the 1983-1987 animatronic counterparts.
Which makes sense why they would match.
But If we are following that logic, why would the toys also follow attack patterns? Unless its the same soul doing the attacking. But their is another explanation.
B. The agony in the metal itself transferred. While the toys do act like the classics movement wise, they don't match all the details. Only containing the amount rage the classics also have. They also are different in the withereds in that regard. All the toys (forgot whether or not mangle can be fooled) Can easily be fooled by wearing the mask, but the withereds are much harder to fool, william went into the fnaf 2 establishment and tampered with the animatronics, and while its never directly said, I think he tampered with the vision of the animatronics so they can no longer identify bad people and criminals so he could easily sneak in. The reason that the toys are so easily fooled is because they literally do not have minds, their just the rage transfered from the prewithereds/classics. But the withereds are much harder to fool because their is a mind, the majority can still be fooled but likely due to the fact that the soul beliefs its just another animatronic like how they fell for Williams lie. (Foxys soul just simply remembers that the mask is fake because of william),
another key piece of evidence to this conclusion would be fnaf 3. During fnaf 3, the toys have already been scrapped, clearly after fnaf 2. but if their was actually souls, this would not be happening. When the fnaf 1 animatronics were destroyed, their souls still remained and haunted because they were put to rest, so why would the toys be so easily put to rest when compared to the classics?
Because we know the phantoms are NOT the animatronics souls. Puppet is literally still alive and intact.
Which would mean the toys truly and utterlly are put to rest.
Hope this helps explanation wise.
Sping lock incient in fanf 3 and the misused suit in night 4 suster locatijn
With the first...im not sure entirely yet. Theirs not much evidence.. So ill talk about it at the end of my answer, if that's alright.
Answer: I believe the suit we see is a minireena suit. Imo.
Before the public outcry Crys out, let me cook.
Compare these two images.
While I'm not saying this is more obvious than it seems, the suit and the minireenas both carry heavily similaritys in design choice.
Its not puppet because the puppet Henry made wasn't springlock, and William would not make a security device.
Obviously not chica, as we see fun time chica later.
and so I think its more obviously spring minireena. The reason its right next to where ballora would be and why the minireenas flood in is because to them, your literally in the suit of their family.
Ive heard people often say the fun times are representative in ways to the afton family. And you could make a case for each, but you never hear who would represent afton,
well. Wouldn't it make sense that the only spring lock funtime and the one that is related as well to the minireenas be representative of afton?
The creepy grin as if always joyful and dancing being a expression of how he feels when hes in the suit, like the glitch trap in fnaf VR for example. (not saying that's afton, but the mimic is mimicking how afton would act there. )
The suit is also more isolated than the others in sl. Which again, makes sense when thinking of afton and his relationship with his family.
About the fnaf 3 springlock suits, the game mentions it once and isn't clear.
It could refer to multiple suits going off at once, or maybe one suit going off. (As spring locks could just refer to more than one springlock mechanism in the suit.)
But either way I dont think its referring to the bite victim. Yes, they died because "Technically" the springlocks went off and collapsed the jaw, but that would more likely be referred to as a bite of 83, or a other name. I don't think it would make sense to refer to it as the "Multiple spring lock failure" as it was just the ones in the jaw and the main reason it happened was because he cried after being forced into the animatronics metal jaw. Yes, the suit killed him, but the fault lies more on the people forcing him on the jaw of the animatronic itself.
And so, I came up with two explanations and answers for your question.
A. Its referring to a single suit activating its spring locks and going wild.
B. Its referring to two suits.
Because of this, ill give depth on both.
A,2. With the first explanation, it would be possible under one "What if", we would have to assume that the incident that William went through on the books where he was spring locked and survived also exists in the games as a canon event. If it were, it would make sense why its mentioned; the game that features him as a antagonist telling of a mistake he made that almost cost him his life early in his career. Theirs not as much evidence, as again, they don't go in-depth on the incident.
B,2. The assumption of it being two suits would naturally draw the possibility of it being the creation of shadow freddy and shadow bonnie. But unlike most explanations, I dont think that its actually their souls still in the suits.
Obviously, the only ones with access to the suits are employees, so if it is two suits that spring locked, its more likely employees than anything else.
But the suits are fundamentally different than the others. They are like golden freddy in the way that their mysterious, lore important, unexplained, and can teleport. But different coloration and attitude.
And then ,theirs the fundamental difference in how shadow bonnie acts early timeline vs late timeline.
Shadow Freddy appears two times in the entire game series, both relatively benevolent.
But shadow bonnie appears multiple times. Even in the books. In fnaf ar and the Fazbear fright story "Hide and seek" he is extremely violent after certain actions are taken, (fnaf ar, being When the player takes in too much of the miasma looking substance, while in hide and seek its because Toby cheated and or broke something, iirc).
But in fnaf 2, he just crashes the games, and in fnaf 3 he tries to set the souls free. Which makes me think as a person, he likely was a very justice/order focused person, when his body was removed from the suit, it only left the agony and mindset of him in the suit.
But with shadow freddy I think its likely his soul was more kind. We don't see him ever take a violent option and only guide people. Sure, he teleports next to the player in fnaf 3, but I don't recall ever hearing he actually kills the player. Which would possibly mean that during his lifespan, he possibly just loved his job and being in the suit, guiding children to the birthday room and performing.
I don't have much explanation for them. Or the spring lock incident, until its actually addressed.
Please give feedback below
