Novel trilogy: non-canon
Fazbear frights: half-canon
Tales from the pizzaplex: canon
Interactive novels: canon
Novel trilogy: non-canon
Fazbear frights: half-canon
Tales from the pizzaplex: canon
Interactive novels: canon
How.
For starters, they take place in two completely different states, the Puppet exists in one but not the other, there would be two William Aftons, Two MCIs at a Freddy’s, it just doesn’t work
Reinterpretation.
And the puppet doesnt exist in either the movie or the trilogy, actually.
And while im not saying it takes place in the movie, it doesnt take place in the game
The fourth closet universe directly killed henry.
And the puppet doesnt exist in either the movie or the trilogy, actually
Do your research
And while im not saying it takes place in the movie, it doesnt take place in the game
Then what were you trying to say? Because you said they possibly take place in the same universe when I made a point about Ella being in the movie
They are all canon, possibly except for the twelfth volume of Fazbear Frights.
I said they could.
And my point was, the games cant have ella, because that is the universe that has to have the fourth closet and henry killing himself.
And the fazbear frights MUST have a connection to the books because of that.
And what does that prove?
Sure, puppet might exist in the movie, but that doesnt mean that my previous point about the ff's having a connection to ella being any less valid. Even if the movie isnt connected to the trilogy,the frights physically have to be.
The Puppet is in the second movie?
Scott called the novel trilogy and movies alternative timelines that still remain canonical within the general universe. He didn't name Fazbear Frights AU, but they are directly related to game events, and a game was also made based on one of the books (I hope everyone understands that games are part of the game timeline). Tales from the Pizzaplex was named part of the games, and other elements from this series appeared in the games. Everything is already clear about interactive novels.
Sure, puppet might exist in the movie, but that doesnt mean that my previous point about the ff's having a connection to ella being any less valid. Even if the movie isnt connected to the trilogy,the frights physically have to be.
(I hope everyone understands that games are part of the game timeline)
Also, by that logic, is the troll games part of the timeline?
Freddy in space?
Fnaf world?
FLaF?
Fnaf AR?
Strangely enough, just because it is a game, doesnt mean its part of the game timeline,
The tales; they have enough evidence.
Same for interactive novels
But the FF's inclusion of ella is a deal breaker; the only reason it exists as a small doll was to be made by henry for the fourth closet. The same goes for Puppet; it only exists in a universe where henry wanted to protect his daughter with the security puppet.
The fazbear frights might be metaphors, but dont take direct place in the games at all times, as they show different versions of the animatronics
Funtime freddy shouldnt be in some persons garage for example. hes already part of ennard at that point. or in the bunker.
Or maybe how Shadow bonnie is not sentient in the slightest in the books but shows THOUGHTS in the game
Or maybe how susies resting soul departs way differently than the games.
Or perhaps how in the FF's. The phantoms could physically attack people.
What do you think?