For once I’m not the one instigating lore arguments

I mean it would be nicer for it to actually be like a horror movie like having some gore or really gross scenes (but dont listen to me i love the alien movies)

Yeah but that’s obviously not what this trilogy will have

This series has had plenty of retcons.

Scott just doesnt like to admit it

Charlie's gender is a confirmed retcon, dream theorys heavily implied to be a retcon, the toys possession story likely was retconned.

When making a story, making no retcons is physically impossible.

Half of those things you said were likely/confirmed retconned were not confirmed/likely headcanon

Just because the community establishes something to be canon doesn't mean it was actually canon

Why are we debating lore under a post making a joke against who says "I wAnT gOrE iN mOvIeS. sCoTt WaNtEd It ToO" ?

I try one time to not be a purist about the lore and this happens

^^^fair point, it just feels like from a obvious story perspective, charlie and dream theory were obvious retcons

Considering charlie was originally a boy in the story

And in every other source is referred to or shown as a girl. which feels like a obvious retcon, unless charlie is trans which i would prefer scott actually clarify that and tell us,

And how scott said his original vision of the story changed at fnaf 4

(ok,i admit the toys are more my personal theory, mb, but still, their are times scott obviously made a retcon)

Why the fuck are yall debating about lore, in a litteral post thats talking about people being edgy.

I want the FNaF 2 movie to be at least on the same horror level as The Conjuring or The Exorcist, those were great horror movies