2,964
pages
ALL POSTSMangle is NOT FUNTIME FOXY
<p>Mangle is not Funtime Foxy. Mangle is Toy Foxy. I just wanted to say this because the Mangle=Funtime Foxy theory makes absolutely no sense. Feel free to argue about it with me if you disagree.
</p>
(Edited by PleaseStandBy247)
Easy enough to do.
(Edited by Starscream1998)
I like MatPat's 'canonicity' and 'continuity' thingy regarding the games and the novels.
(Edited by SinFaz - X)
<p>Yeah, he explained it pretty well
</p>
(Edited by Got9CatsAndI'mProud)
It was a good and concise explanation that honestly I think the community really needed.
(Edited by Starscream1998)
Too bad everyone is too busy pretending he's an idiot to listen
(Edited by Got9CatsAndI'mProud)
Feels bad.
(Edited by SinFaz - X)
<p>I remember listening to some excerpts of Matt and Steph on a podcast they were guests on talking about Youtube algorithms and let me just flat out say this: Behind all the jokes and dramatics Matthew Patrick is NO intellectual slouch. He and Stephanie know their stuff and are the unironic version of the meme big brain. Does the man get things wrong, yes of course he does but to this day he still the only individual aside from Dawko Scott has complimented as a FNAF theorist.
</p>
(Edited by Starscream1998)
<p>MatPat is probably the man to go to for FNaF theorys, idk much about Dawko
</p>
(Edited by Yeetweegee)
<p>Dawko's a pretty fair theorist though he's more of the 'conversation starter' type theorist than the 'timeline builder' theorist MatPat is.
</p>
(Edited by Starscream1998)
I just never really watch Dawko's theories because they're just so long. Like MatPat's are like 20 minutes but Dawko's are like 40.
(Edited by Modernmyrmidon)