<div class="quote"><i>Gaurdianaq wrote:
ya I'm thinking I'm just gonna wait for the book at this point, I'm curious to see the second half of matpats theory but ultimately I really think the book will give us a lot of insite</i></div>
<p>Same, I have posted my final theory and am defending it with everything I got. After that, I'm just gonna chill until the book is released. Only concern is if Scott doesn't solve everything.   </p>

<p>Its just that the imagination theory is kinda lazy, I used to be opened to the imagination theory because I was lazy myself, but after PBE's big'un I understood that I should get my ass up and think for once. </p><p>I guess, one might aswell be lazy... </p>

<p>Well keep in mind that the dream theory (or at least matpats version of it) doesn't necessarily meantthat the child fabricated everything in his mind, that he created these murders and such in his head, only that the gameplay is a dream, but he even says in his version of the theory the lore is real, just that the gameplay is a dream but there are still events that we learn of in the lore that ACTUALLY happened </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Sp3ctr3EX wrote: Its just that the imagination theory is kinda lazy, I used to be opened to the imagination theory because I was lazy myself, but after PBE's big'un I understood that I should get my ass up and think for once. </p><p>I guess, one might aswell be lazy... </p> </i></div>
<p>Join the lazy league of the Dream team and let your mind rest for once. </p><p>No more 87 vs 83 debates. No more gigantic, complicated PBE mega threads. No more brainstorming. </p><p>(I'd be glad to take the lead as the Dream theorists' leader.) </p>

<div class="quote"><i>Pinkpony50 wrote: <p>Join the lazy league of the Dream team and let your mind rest for once. </p><p>No more 87 vs 83 debates. No more gigantic, complicated PBE mega threads. No more brainstorming. </p><p>(I'd be glad to take the lead as the Dream theorists' leader.) </p> </i></div>
<p>So you approve of the dream/imagination theory, you are a box of surprises :P
</p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Sp3ctr3EX wrote: </p> <div class="quote">Pinkpony50 wrote: <p>Join the lazy league of the Dream team and let your mind rest for once. </p><p>No more 87 vs 83 debates. No more gigantic, complicated PBE mega threads. No more brainstorming. </p><p>(I'd be glad to take the lead as the Dream theorists' leader.) </p> </i></div>
<p>So you approve of the dream/imagination theory, you are a box of surprises :P
</p> </div> <p>Evidence never lies. </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Evidence never lies. </p> </i></div>
<p>Phone Guy = Purple Guy certainly has a lot of evidence. </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>PBEgaming wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>Evidence never lies. </p> </i></div>
<p>Phone Guy = Purple Guy certainly has a lot of evidence. </p> </div> <p>I see what you did there. Very clever. </p>

<div class="quote"><i>Pinkpony50 wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Kfj2991 wrote: </p> <div class="quote">Emilio1309 wrote:
BUT THE QUESTION IS <p>IF MATPAT IS RIGHT </p><p>EVERYTHING THAT WE MAKE </p><p>IS WRONG? </p> </i></div>
Then we slap Scott for making such a stupid story. The games a fun, but a dream ruins it. </div>"But the question is, will the community accept it that way?" - Scott. <p>I personally agree with Matpat for the ton of evidences he shared that pointed towards the Dream theory (two of which I favored, such as the use of the grandfather clock and the "tiny toy chica"). It's more logical than other theories (including those shared by the theorists of this Wikia, such as PBE), and fits in perfectly with the quote I mentioned above. </p><p>It succeeds in explaining the unexplained. </p> </div> <p>Go away dream theorist </p>

Also go ahead you can be dream theorist leader I honestly don't care.