2,965
pages
ALL POSTSwhere does fnaf 1 take place?
<p>no. for real. i know what you're thinking. "but num3r5 d00d x5. it obviosly takes place in 1993 because of the minimum wage" wll what if... YOU WERE NOT BIENG PAID MINIMUM WAGE!!! the owner was practicly a criminal. so what if you were paid less? or over minimum wage? "but why does fnaf 2 pay less?" it only ran a few weeks. its still getting of the ground. then fnaf 1? they were out for a few years. so it can afford to pay more? please give me you're oppinion on this!
</p>
(Edited by Numb3r5 d00d x5)
<div class="quote"><i>Are You Freddy For Ready wrote:
They spend the smaller budget on the power</i></div>
<p>wait a SECOND!!! it did not close because of timing to popular belief!!!! its because it could not afford a sucruty gaurd paycheck! or a survivor!
</p>
They spend the smaller budget on the power</i></div>
<p>wait a SECOND!!! it did not close because of timing to popular belief!!!! its because it could not afford a sucruty gaurd paycheck! or a survivor!
</p>
(Edited by Numb3r5 d00d x5)
<p>It closed because of the animatronics smelling, and also phone guys death
</p>
(Edited by Are You Freddy For Ready)
ever notice this? phone guy fnaf 1: "they used to be able to walk around during the day to. and then the bite of '87" phone guy fnaf 2: "we EVEN let them walk around during the day. isnt that neat?" why would he say isnt that neat. and walk around during the day too. would it be surprising if the bite hasnt already taken place?
(Edited by Numb3r5 d00d x5)
<div class="quote"><i>Numb3r5 d00d x5 wrote:
ever notice this? phone guy fnaf 1: "they used to be able to walk around during the day to. and then the bite of '87" phone guy fnaf 2: "we EVEN let them walk around during the day. isnt that neat?" why would he say isnt that neat. and walk around during the day too. would it be surprising if the bite hasnt already taken place?</i></div>
<p>
Maybe, but I1m pretty sure Phone Guy wouldn't consider it "Neat" that the animatronics that almost killed him are now free to roam around, if infact FNAF 2 is a sequel. </p><p>Also, assuming for a moment that the FNAF 1 check is just an old one, let's say Night 1 of the FNAF 1 game is January 2nd, 1987. Bite of 87 happend on January 1st. There are 7 nights in total, meaning that the earliest point in time when the FNAF 1 pizzaria closed down, would have had to have been January 8th, 1987. </p><p>This leaves for the company less than 10 months to go from completely bankrupt to having a renewed shining company image, with new animatronics, bells and whistles, everything, in order to have FNAF 2 take place in November 1987. </p><p>I bet BP would have bought that PR campaign for a dollar! (Obscure Robocop refernces for the win!) </p><p>
</p><p>Also just to point out: Checks don't work like that either. They wouldn't date a check back in november last year, to fill it out some in the future, so FNAF 1 had to have taken place in November too, which again, puts it AFTER 1987, as it couldn't possibly happen at the exact same time as FNAF 2, since we're talking about two extremely seperate companies, as far as popularity is concerned. </p>
ever notice this? phone guy fnaf 1: "they used to be able to walk around during the day to. and then the bite of '87" phone guy fnaf 2: "we EVEN let them walk around during the day. isnt that neat?" why would he say isnt that neat. and walk around during the day too. would it be surprising if the bite hasnt already taken place?</i></div>
<p>
Maybe, but I1m pretty sure Phone Guy wouldn't consider it "Neat" that the animatronics that almost killed him are now free to roam around, if infact FNAF 2 is a sequel. </p><p>Also, assuming for a moment that the FNAF 1 check is just an old one, let's say Night 1 of the FNAF 1 game is January 2nd, 1987. Bite of 87 happend on January 1st. There are 7 nights in total, meaning that the earliest point in time when the FNAF 1 pizzaria closed down, would have had to have been January 8th, 1987. </p><p>This leaves for the company less than 10 months to go from completely bankrupt to having a renewed shining company image, with new animatronics, bells and whistles, everything, in order to have FNAF 2 take place in November 1987. </p><p>I bet BP would have bought that PR campaign for a dollar! (Obscure Robocop refernces for the win!) </p><p>
</p><p>Also just to point out: Checks don't work like that either. They wouldn't date a check back in november last year, to fill it out some in the future, so FNAF 1 had to have taken place in November too, which again, puts it AFTER 1987, as it couldn't possibly happen at the exact same time as FNAF 2, since we're talking about two extremely seperate companies, as far as popularity is concerned. </p>
(Edited by BNTHAATPT (Abbreviation))
Which confirms FNaF2 to be a prequel.
(Edited by Are You Freddy For Ready)
<div class="quote"><i>Are You Freddy For Ready wrote:
Which confirms FNaF2 to be a prequel.</i></div>
<p>Aye, that's what I was trying to say.
</p>
Which confirms FNaF2 to be a prequel.</i></div>
<p>Aye, that's what I was trying to say.
</p>
(Edited by BNTHAATPT (Abbreviation))
What is your name an abbreviation for?
(Edited by Are You Freddy For Ready)
(Edited by BNTHAATPT (Abbreviation))
<div class="quote"><i>BNTHAATPT (Abbreviation) wrote:
<div class="quote">Numb3r5 d00d x5 wrote:
ever notice this? phone guy fnaf 1: "they used to be able to walk around during the day to. and then the bite of '87" phone guy fnaf 2: "we EVEN let them walk around during the day. isnt that neat?" why would he say isnt that neat. and walk around during the day too. would it be surprising if the bite hasnt already taken place?</i></div>
Maybe, but I1m pretty sure Phone Guy wouldn't consider it "Neat" that the animatronics that almost killed him are now free to roam around, if infact FNAF 2 is a sequel. <p>Also, assuming for a moment that the FNAF 1 check is just an old one, let's say Night 1 of the FNAF 1 game is January 2nd, 1987. Bite of 87 happend on January 1st. There are 7 nights in total, meaning that the earliest point in time when the FNAF 1 pizzaria closed down, would have had to have been January 8th, 1987. </p><p>This leaves for the company less than 10 months to go from completely bankrupt to having a renewed shining company image, with new animatronics, bells and whistles, everything, in order to have FNAF 2 take place in November 1987. </p><p>I bet BP would have bought that PR campaign for a dollar! (Obscure Robocop refernces for the win!) </p><p>
</p><p>Also just to point out: Checks don't work like that either. They wouldn't date a check back in november last year, to fill it out some in the future, so FNAF 1 had to have taken place in November too, which again, puts it AFTER 1987, as it couldn't possibly happen at the exact same time as FNAF 2, since we're talking about two extremely seperate companies, as far as popularity is concerned. </p> </div> <p>1: he said its neat. not that he liked it. 2: it would be illegal to use outdated checks. 3: a new company bought it. 4: quit spioling! 5: the fnaf 1 check says the following year: xxxx. it could have happend anytime. cause it does not say. 1993.
</p>
<div class="quote">Numb3r5 d00d x5 wrote:
ever notice this? phone guy fnaf 1: "they used to be able to walk around during the day to. and then the bite of '87" phone guy fnaf 2: "we EVEN let them walk around during the day. isnt that neat?" why would he say isnt that neat. and walk around during the day too. would it be surprising if the bite hasnt already taken place?</i></div>
Maybe, but I1m pretty sure Phone Guy wouldn't consider it "Neat" that the animatronics that almost killed him are now free to roam around, if infact FNAF 2 is a sequel. <p>Also, assuming for a moment that the FNAF 1 check is just an old one, let's say Night 1 of the FNAF 1 game is January 2nd, 1987. Bite of 87 happend on January 1st. There are 7 nights in total, meaning that the earliest point in time when the FNAF 1 pizzaria closed down, would have had to have been January 8th, 1987. </p><p>This leaves for the company less than 10 months to go from completely bankrupt to having a renewed shining company image, with new animatronics, bells and whistles, everything, in order to have FNAF 2 take place in November 1987. </p><p>I bet BP would have bought that PR campaign for a dollar! (Obscure Robocop refernces for the win!) </p><p>
</p><p>Also just to point out: Checks don't work like that either. They wouldn't date a check back in november last year, to fill it out some in the future, so FNAF 1 had to have taken place in November too, which again, puts it AFTER 1987, as it couldn't possibly happen at the exact same time as FNAF 2, since we're talking about two extremely seperate companies, as far as popularity is concerned. </p> </div> <p>1: he said its neat. not that he liked it. 2: it would be illegal to use outdated checks. 3: a new company bought it. 4: quit spioling! 5: the fnaf 1 check says the following year: xxxx. it could have happend anytime. cause it does not say. 1993.
</p>
(Edited by Numb3r5 d00d x5)
<p>So what side are you on, prequel or sequel. Prequel is a much stronger side, and sequel is like 1% of the fnaf2 fanbase
</p>
(Edited by Are You Freddy For Ready)